Koha spine label is not printing the “/” in your call numbers? Here is why.

If you have defined DDC as your classification source and have a “/” in your Koha item call number, it is not going to be displayed when generating spine labels. If you are in hurry or you are aware of the segmentation mark, you can jump straight to the section The Answer.

The “Problem”

Earlier in the day a fellow user Dyuti Samanta came up with a question :

“Sir, I’m trying print spine labels from Koha. However I see that Koha does not print the the front slash (“/”) in my itemcallnumber, even though the same is recorded in my MARC record and is otherwise displayed by Koha elsewhere. For example, the “CHA / L” in “025.4 CHA / L” is being printed as “CHAL”. So where is the problem, how can I fix it?”

The Background

Dyuti’s question made me smile. And instead of immediately telling him about the “why” I pointed him to a comment left by Anamika Das on Vimal Kumar Vazaphally‘s blog post – “Spine label creation” saying “You are not alone with that question! ;-)”.

A call number typically consists of Dewey class number + book number i.e. Cutter number (or some other means of alphabetic arrangement). The frontslash “/” is deemed as a segmentation mark (ala prime mark of in C-I-P records) in the universe of Dewey Decimal Classification[1]. Up until DDC 22 published in 2003 [2], the slash or the prime mark was used to mark the start of every standard subdivision (notation from Table 1) as well as the end of the Abridged number. However, this rule changed from DDC 22 onwards (September 1, 2005 to be exact) and remains extant for the current edition i.e. DDC 23 published in 2011. The new rule has been that only *one* single segmentation mark may be used and that too only for marking the end of the abridged number [3].

A prior and post example straight from Library of Congress

Before DDC 22 – 551.21/09797/84

DDC 22 onward – 551.210979/84

Further, if you follow LC and OCLC norms, while Dewey class number in MARC21 field 082 can definitely have (since Sep 1, 2005) a *single* segmentation mark, the call number should never have one. With this background story in place let’s look at Koha to understand what is happening here.

The Answer

The particular Koha code that has taken out the the slash from both Dyuti and Anamika’s call numbers resides in C4::Labels::Label Perl module which is located at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Labels/Label.pm. Even more specifically, it is the _split_ddcn subroutine in Label.pm that is taking out the “/“. As we have already noted, under LC rules, call numbers (unlike Dewey class numbers in 082) can’t have segmentation marks. Thus it takes out any “/” embedded in your call number while processing the spine label. Very specifically, it is this line in the _split_ddcn subroutine: s/\///g; # in theory we should be able to simply remove all segmentation markers and arrive at the correct call number that does it. And just why does _split_ddcn get invoked? Well, it is because of something you did during cataloging, remember that you had recorded DDC as the classification schema? It is that definition in your MARC record that calls in this sub 😀

Below you can see the _split_ddcn subroutine as on date of this post.

sub _split_ddcn {
    my ($ddcn) = @_;
    $_ = $ddcn;
    s/\///g;   # in theory we should be able to simply remove all segmentation markers and arrive at the correct call number...
    my (@parts) = m/
        ^([-a-zA-Z]*\s?(?:$possible_decimal)?) # R220.3  CD-ROM 787.87 # will require extra splitting
        \s+
        (.+)                               # H2793Z H32 c.2 EAS # everything else (except bracketing spaces)
        \s*
        /x;
    unless (scalar @parts)  {
        warn sprintf('regexp failed to match string: %s', $_);
        push @parts, $_;     # if no match, just push the whole string.
    }

    if ($parts[0] =~ /^([-a-zA-Z]+)\s?($possible_decimal)$/) {
          shift @parts;         # pull off the mathching first element, like example 1
        unshift @parts, $1, $2; # replace it with the two pieces
    }

    push @parts, split /\s+/, pop @parts;   # split the last piece into an arbitrary number of pieces at spaces
    $debug and print STDERR "split_ddcn array: ", join(" | ", @parts), "\n";
    return @parts;
}

Note: The _split_ddcn was first submitted to the Koha codebase as part of C4::Labels::Label module by Chris Nighswonger on Jul 20, 2009, by which time the LC’s single segmentation mark rule was already long in place.

So now what?

There are a few options available to you at this point.

(a) If you know what you are doing, you can modify the _split_ddcn sub routine so that it does not discard the “/” and handles the call number as you want it to. (Non trivial and not recommended)

dontsplit

(b) Go to “Manage Layouts” and editing your specific layout by un-checking the option “Split call number“. If you do this then your call number will be printed AS-IS as a single line of text. This means, if the call number is longer that the size of your labels, as they will be at several point in time, you have a *problem*

(c) Keep an eye out to this bug report filed by Katrin Fisher from earlier this year, where she has said:

Currently the call number splitting seems to be mostly implemented for DDC and LC classifications. Those are both not very common in Germany and possibly other countries. A lot of our libraries use their own custom classification schemes so the call number splitting is something that should be individually configurable.

The bad new is that so far no one has responded to this bug, simply because to Koha developers servicing clients using LC / DDC, this is not a priority. So either you can wait with the hope that someone soon will attend to this bug OR you write this functionality yourself OR you sponsor a developer to write it for you.

(d) Take the item call number listing out of Koha as a CSV file and use a 3rd party tool, e.g, gLabels to generate your spine labels.

References:

[1] https://www.loc.gov/aba/dewey/segmentation.html

[2] Dewey_Decimal_Classification – Administration_and_publication

[3] “Sweet segment solution” from 025.431: The Dewey blog